Response to Marek Krawczyk's Post "One Art Form to Describe The Other"

Why should we give a specific definition to art? Why should we define something that is changing with an art form that is also changing?  It can be repetitive hearing different philosophers try to explain the same thing in different ways, almost like how an out dated map has different names for the same place.  But I find this only crosses my mind when I take the topic too seriously.  Sometimes we need to not scrutinize art so intensely and enjoy it for what it is, while keeping a balance of taking it seriously and not just accept a work of art for what it is.