Q: Should we even discuss what makes up the qualities of good art?
I think that the word art is a large umbrella and because so much can fall under the umbrella and be classified as art that everyone is capable of making some form of art. And why should anyones art be susceptible criticism? I believe negativity has no part in the art world, but this does not mean art should not be shared. It should be open for discussion and comparison without a competitive mindset.
This is why I believe discussing what makes up the qualities of art to be unnecessary. It could only lead to transforming the 'good art' into a popular standard or scientific method towards art of which rebellion will arise and new sub-genres of the art for will form.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment